psychminded.co.uk
News
 
x home   x
x
x courses    
x conferences    
x archive/big issues    
x comment    
x books - new & used    
x members forum    
x contact us    
x advertise your jobs, courses & conferences    


New and second-hand psychology psychiatry and mental health books...


Get email news updates at the members forum


Email a colleague
about this article

 

 


Comment

Treating schizophrenia without drugs? There's good evidence for it.

April 24, 2009

Award-winning researcher and psychiatrist Tim Calton examines studies demonstrating how psychosis can be managed without medication. Such non-drug approaches shoud no longer be ignored, he argues.

......

Over two hundred years ago medical psychiatry planted its standard within the realm of the human experience of 'madness', quickly becoming the dominant paradigm. Other ways of understanding and tending to mental distress were suffocated or retreated to the margins. Psychiatry's success in creating and disseminating knowledge about those forms of life which get described as 'madness', 'psychosis', or 'schizophrenia', quickly becomes apparent when surveying the first National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for the treatment of people diagnosed with schizophrenia.

This document, a synopsis of so-called 'best practice' in the clinical treatment of 'schizophrenia' within the NHS, clearly states that antipsychotic drugs are necessary in the treatment of an acute episode (National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2002), a mandate not extended to psychosocial interventions.

Last month we had the updated guidelines (National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2009). They do appear somewhat more balanced (stating that cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy should be offered alongside medication), although important semantic emphases remain (such as the fact that clinicians need only 'discuss' alternative therapies, not necessarily offer them). The importance granted medication, at the expense of other ways of understanding and helping with mental distress, reflects the tendency for medical psychiatry to see aspects of the vast and complex realm of human experience as mere disease.

Although the NICE guidelines carry a powerful political imprimatur they reflect the deep but extremely narrow tradition of biomedical research into madness; research which would have us believe that the only way to 'get better' and 'stay well' are to take antipsychotic medication, for life if necessary.

The question remains, however, as to whether it is possible to help people experiencing 'psychosis' without recourse to antipsychotic medication? Such a question might provoke a range of immediate and urgent responses depending on your sociopolitical context, life history and experience. One way of mediating this array of responses would be to scrutinise 'the evidence' supporting the use of no or minimal medication approaches to the treatment of 'psychosis'/'schizophrenia'.

There is certainly a wealth of historical evidence supporting a non-medical approach to madness ranging from Geel, the city in Belgium where the 'mad' lived with local families, receiving support and care that allowed them to function in the 'normal' social world despite the emotional distress some experienced (Goldstein, 2003), to the so-called Moral Treatment developed at the York Retreat by William Tuke towards the end of the eighteenth century (Digby, 1985), which advocated peace, respect, and dignity in all relationships, and emphasised the importance of maintaining usual social activities, work and exercise. These approaches, predicated as they were on a gentle and humane engagement with the vagaries of human experience at the limits, and invoking respect, dignity, collective responsibility, and an emphasis on interpersonal relationships as guiding principles, have much to tell contemporary biomedical psychiatry.

In the modern era, non-medical attempts to understand and tend to 'psychosis' have coalesced into a tradition counterposed to the biomedical orthodoxy. The richest seam of evidence within this tradition is that relating to Soteria House , the project developed by Loren Mosher and colleagues in San Francisco during the early 1970s (www.moshersoteria.com and Soteria Network booklet). Here, people diagnosed with schizophrenia could live in a suburban house staffed with non-professionals who would spend time 'being' with them in an attempt to try and secure shared meanings and understandings of their subjective experience.

Antipsychotic medication was marginalised, being considered a barrier to the project of understanding the other, and was only ever taken from a position of informed and voluntary choice. Arguably the most radical aspect of the Soteria project was the emphasis given to building a case across many different rhetorical levels, including the scientific/evidential. Subjected to a randomised controlled trial in comparison to 'treatment as usual' (TAU - hospitalisation and medication), with follow-up assessments at six weeks and two years, it proved at least as effective as TAU with some specific advantages in terms of significantly greater improvements in global psychopathology and composite outcome, significantly more participants living independently, and significantly fewer readmissions (Bola, 2003). A Swiss iteration of Soteria reported similar results and suggested these could be achieved at no greater fiscal cost than TAU (Ciompi, 1992), whilst a recent systematic review of all the evidence pertaining to Soteria confirmed both claims (Calton, 2008).

More evidence supporting the use of non-medical approaches to helping people diagnosed with 'psychosis' / 'schizophrenia' has emerged from Scandinavia and the USA (Calton, 2009). In the former, so-called 'Need Adapted' treatment, an approach which places great emphasis on interpersonal relationships and striving after meaning, whilst decentring medication, treating it as merely one of a plurality of interventions, is associated with people spending less time in hospital, experiencing fewer 'psychotic' symptoms, being more likely to hold down a job, and taking much less antipsychotic medication. In the latter, evidence from an innovative series of research projects conducted in the 1970s suggests not only that people diagnosed with 'schizophrenia' can recover without the use of antipsychotic medication when exposed to a nurturing and tolerant therapeutic environment, but also that antipsychotic medication may not be the treatment of choice, at least for certain people, if the goal is long-term improvement.

To conclude then, it seems appropriate, given the evidence, to claim that the human experience of 'psychosis' can be helped without recourse to the use of antipsychotic medication. The research cited above does not appear to have been considered in the current NICE guidelines (presumably because of the small number of studies undertaken using minimal or no medication approaches), though may well be incorporated into the next iteration. This should happen because the lack of any meaningful idea of choice with regard to treatment for people diagnosed with 'psychosis' / 'schizophrenia' in the UK is abundantly apparent; a state of affairs that may not be sustainable given recent pronouncements on patient choice (DoH, 2008).

We must remember, honour and reiterate these alternative traditions of thought and practice if we are to overcome the extant biomedical hegemony.

* Tim Calton is a psychiatrist and winner of the 2005 Royal College of Psychiatrists Research Prize and Bronze Medal. He is a research fellow at the Institute of Mental Health in Nottingham and special lecturer in the department of health psychology at the University of Nottingham. He is also a member of the Critical Psychiatry Network which holds its conference on June 22, 2009
* Booklet on the Soteria Network (pdf)

REFERENCES:
* National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Schizophrenia: Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Primary and Secondary Care. London , NICE, 2002

* National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Schizophrenia: Updated Guidelines for Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Primary and Secondary Care. London , NICE, 2009

* Goldstein JL, Godemont, M.M.L.: The legend and lessons of Geel , Belgium : A 1500-year-old legend, a 21st-century model. Community Mental Health Journal 2003; 39(5):441-450

* Digby A: Madness, Morality and Medicine: A Study of the York Retreat, 1796-1914. Cambridge , Cambridge University Press, 1985

* Bola JR, Mosher, L.R.: Treatment of Acute Psychosis Without Neuroleptics: Two-Year Outcomes From the Soteria Project. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 2003; 191(4):219-29

* Ciompi L, Dauwalder, H.P., Maier, C. et al: The pilot project "Soteria Bern": clinical experiences and results. British Journal of Psychiatry 1992; 161:145-53

* Calton T, Ferriter, M., Huband, N., Spandler, H.: A Systematic Review of the Soteria Paradigm for the Treatment of People Diagnosed with Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2008; 34(1):181-192

* Calton, T., Spandler, H.: Minimal Medication Approaches to the Treatment of People Diagnosed with Schizophrenia. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2009 (in press)

* Department of Health: High Quality Care for All. London , DoH, 2008

See also:
April 18, 2008: Underground recovery - Clinical psychologist Rufus May explains why, when using a non-drug approach to help a doctor who heard voices, he had no choice but to work in secret.

......

Success with psychotherapy and vitamins

From: Chagai Dubrawsky, physician, community clinic, Oak Ridge North, Houston, USA
Date: April 29, 2009

The article failed to mention Dr Abram Hoffer, a Canadian psychiatrist who treated 5000 schizophrenics
with psychotherapy and niacin (Vitamin B3).

He claimed 90% success. He wrote 15 books and 300
a rticles on the subject. I believe that he is still alive at age of 95 years.

.....

Antipsychotics did not help me

From: Polly Mortimer, journalist, Haringey, London
Date: November 27, 2009

Having been at the receiving end of a large dose, longish term, of antipsychotics in the 70s, I can say that they did not help me recover and left a ghastly hangover as well as the usual dreary and dangerous side effects.

A completely different approach is long overdue. Roll on asylum in the truest sense - safe places with human support, good nutrition, vitamins and minerals, rest, talking therapies etc etc.

In the very very short term I guess sedatives could be used, but recovery must be at the centre, and nothing must jeopardise that.

......

Symptoms are 'prolonged stress'

From: Susan Jickells, England, UK
Date: June 24, 2010

Polly. I agree totally with your views on medication. How did you come through after being medicated and how did you reach a place of healing and wellbeing?

Tim. My daughter is currently being drugged against her will. We tried to explain that Claire was on a journey of self discovery and that the symptoms were a response to prolonged stress and deep resentment and anger due to the traumatic events that had plagued her life.

I feel devastated that my thirty-three-year-old daughter cannot choose to be supported with out medication.

I keep thinking of how it must feel to wake up in a fog and not have any choice in whether it clears or not. Have you any suggestions for my daughter and I. I feel like running away with Claire and letting her work her own way out of her current situation.

.....

Omega3/6 as alternative to medication?

From: Andy Lale, Lead Music Therapist, Gordon Hospital Victoria London
Date: September 13, 2011

Hi Tim - I am an analytic music psychotherapist working in London. My clinical work is based around the inpatient unit at the Gordon Hospital for CNWL NHS trust.

I am wondering whether it might be possible to peruse a PHD study in whether a small well-staffed and forward-thinking inpatient unit could work interpersonally as a group to contain and modify psychotic processes without medication.

I am interested in the studies on EPA  and omega3/6 as alternative medication while making full use of well-informed analytic psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions that might support that work.

My main question is whether anyone would be prepared to entertain this study in the current climate and whether it is even considered legal to offer this choice as a form of treatment for sectioned patients.

Any thoughts or links you have that I could make use of would be very gratefully received.

Share/Bookmark
Add your comments
What do you think? Email your comments on the above
article to the editor using the form below. Selected comments will be displayed.

First name:
Last name:
Current position:
Place of work:
E-mail address:
Story commenting upon: (type in article headline)
Comments: (you may find it easier to copy and paste from a word file)
 

© 2001-7  Psychminded Limited. All rights reserved

Email a colleague
about this article

 

 

 

 


Nottingham Trent University courses



Receive job and news updates by email



April 9, 2008: This tide's already changed - The recovery approach in mental health is not new say Phil Barker and Poppy Buchanan-Barker.
Feb 16, 2011: Crisis of masculinity? Time for psychologists to study men- Martin Seager explains why in a society where almost all prisoners are men psychologists should focus more on male psychology.

Oct 9, 2008: Cognitive behavioural therapy; a Labour quick fix
- CBT simplifies what distress is, argues Dorothy Rowe

March 20, 2008: 'Recovery' approach in mental health is idea 'whose time has come' - charity bids to present principles behind “empowering” philosophy of care

Oct 31, 2007: Getting personal - Stop the psychological therapy "brand warfare" argues Martin Seager


Do you need a conference or events photographer?