Psychiatrists
rebuke colleagues over remarks on self harming patients
August
26, 2004
by Adam James
Psychiatrists
have criticised colleagues who described self harming patients as
"wilfully immature", who "displace more needy patients"
and who "seem to thrive on the chaos they cause and attention
they receive."
The
rebukes were posted on the discussion board of doctors.net.uk, an
online resource for psychiatrists and other doctors.
The
lively exchange of opinions at the discussion board had followed
remarks by a GP, Rachel James. Writing at societyguardian.co.uk
she had urged people who self harm: "Please don't lacerate
yourself, come to hospital and then complain about it [the service]."
Dr
James (a pseudonym) was responding to a National Institute for Clinical
Excellence guideline on how accident and emergency (A&E) staff
should treat people who self harm. The guideline urged A&E staff
- including psychiatrists and mental health nurses - to handle people
who self harm with the same respect as they would any other patient.
More
than 50 comments to Dr James's article were posted on the discussion
board of doctors.net.uk, which more than 103,000 doctors have registered
with.
One
doctors.net.uk contributor, consultant psychiatrist Dr David Bramble,
wrote: "I think she [Rachel James] speaks for many of us who
have spent years dealing with these people and, from a psychiatric
point of view, getting metaphorically regularly pissed upon by those
serial offenders who are not mentally ill but seem to thrive on
the chaos they cause and attention they receive.
"In
my humble opinion unless there is a robust clinical reason for not
doing so. They should be encouraged to apologise for and, perhaps
even, pay towards the costs of their wilfully immature behaviour."
Another
contributor, Dr Robert Davies, also a consultant psychiatrist, said
that most self harming patients "will merely be displacing
more needy but less dramatic patients."
Such
consultants' views, which appear to contradict NICE's message, may
be viewed with concern by many other mental health professionals.
In
fact, other psychiatrists on the discussion board voiced disapproval
for their colleague's remarks.
A
senior house officer, Dr Carolyn Nahman, wrote: "I don't approve
of antagonising/being rude/unhelpful to self-harmers - it doesn't
help them or the staff dealing with them."
A
staff grade psychiatrist, Dr Silke-Yvonne Habel, added: "It's
not the patient who is chaotic, but the service. If the service
isn't chaotic, then the patient doesn't need to seek attention by
creating more chaos. You need to offer separate services and dedicate
time."
Dr Robert Davies suggested the guideline increases "the influence
of the nanny state, while totally ignoring a fundamental breakdown
in the fabric of society."
He
said: "They [self-harmers] are an heterogeneous group of patients
This
is a fundamental point, and to focus the guideline on a symptom
or feature is, to put it bluntly, incompetent. These days, when
something goes amiss, it is always the services which have "failed"
the individual. The individual is never considered to have "failed"
society.
"Until
we get shot of this ludicrous notion, our A&E departments, and
wards and clinics will be full of these characters [people who self
harm], some of whom have a legitimate place, but most of whom will
merely be displacing more needy but less dramatic patients."
Dr
Davies went on to suggest that self harming patients be charged
£50 for attendance at an A&E ward.
"This
could be deductable direct, where necessary, from benefits. I certainly
think it would be worth a trial," said Dr Davies.
A
third consultant psychiatrist, Dr Robert Gray, said: "Don`t
forget these patients are not children and at some point they must
take some personal responsibility for their multiple social/relationship/drug/lifestyle/illness
problems.
"For
many of these patients the solution does not lie with health service
professionals but a lot closer to home."
See
also:
July
29, 2004: Treat people who self harm with respect, new guideline
urges professionals - A&E staff should also receive specialist
training, NICE recommends
Treating self harmers like lepers will create more suicides
Comment by:
Shaun
Williams, vocational worker, Lambeth, London
Date:
August 28, 2004
"As an individual who self harmed in the past but overcame
this, I find it amazing that certain psychiatrists suggest self
harmers should pay in A&E wards. I
only self harmed because I felt suicidal, and did not want to die.
The act of harming myself prevented my death.
"I
would suggest far more time is taken up in A&E wards by people
drunk, using drugs etc than people self harming. It is true that
indivduals need to control their harming behaviours but treating
them like lepers will mean more suicides. I for one have burnt and
cut my arms, but never show these off to anyone, so I am certainly
not seeking attention and am ashamed I harmed myself in the past,
but not ashamed I turned up in hospital for help.
.....
Outrageous
comments...but understandable
Comment by:
Wedge Black, director, LifeSIGNS
Date:
October 15, 2004
"Such extreme comments are indeed outrageous, but understandable
considering the personal confusion and frustration of health care
workers who do not understand the syndrome of self injury.
"With
awareness training, and a little empathy, health care workers can
choose to respond to self harm in a professional manner; considering
the whole person, and not simply the damaged tissue
presented. LifeSIGNS
offers free training to health care workers and can be contacted
on training@lifesigns.org.uk
"But
why did Robert Davies bring up the issue of benefits? There is no
rule that people suffering from emotional distress cant hold
professional positions; 1 in 4 people will suffer from some kind
of mental distress during their life."
.....
Training blickers staff to reality of depression
Comment by:
Lacuna Lamb (pseudonym), consultant doctor at Lambeth Hospital,
Landor Road, London
Date:
October 21, 2004
"I
have deliberately used a false name to hide my identity. I
am not a self-harmer but my husband currently is.
"After
over 40 years of mental illness he found that his thoughts drove
him to start doing this early this year. He has done, and is doing,
everything in his power to try and stop doing it.
"He
knows how much distress it causes me and his young son who, although
living with his mother, has become aware that his dad is ill and
sometimes hurts himself.
"He
cannot say why he does it other than that his thoughts make him
do it.
"So
far he has not succeeded in getting the help he needs.
"We
recognise that this behaviour is a symptom of a problem with very
deep roots. He knows that he needs to sort those roots out but also
that he is extremely resistant and very untrusting so he has no
hope.
"What would the learned Robert Davies suggest for someone in
his position?
"My husband is far from immature, not just in age. He is also
highly intelligent and very deep thinking. At the moment I consider
him to be deeply depressed.
"Regarding depression, I remember a young man who had travelled
through the South China Sea by boat to escape an oppressive regime.
He was asked which was worse, to be in the boat not knowing what
might happen, or depression. He said that the depression was worse
because there is no hope. It is a justified truism that no experience
is as valid as first hand experience.
" I cannot suggest strongly enough that psychiatric staff spend
as much informal time with their patients as possible, among them
on the wards, where they still exist. They would learn a lot that
their training blinkers them to."
.....
Doctors
should be trained in psychotherapy
Comment by:
Michael Russon, GP, Hillswick Health Centre, Shetland
Date:
November 17, 2004
"Until
psychotherapy becomes a required part of doctors' training, we will
continue to have inane comments from colleagues who clearly have
no insight into the familial nature of psycopathy and its development."
.....
Adding
psychology to medical science training might help
Comment by:
Mustapha Otuyo, staff nurse, Lynfield Mount Hospital, Bradford
Date:
April 4, 2005
The
unfeeling comments made by some of our eminent psychiatrists towards
self harmers further show the bizarre dichotomy between pure
psychiatry and pragmatic psychology.
It
is rather sad that the over reliance in medicational therapy as
often employed by the psychiatrists would never seem to solve the
problems of self-harming. I
believe it will be an immature optimism to hope that we can solve
the problems of self-harming without demonstrating a little emphathy
towards the patient.
My
suggestion is that psychology should be added to anatomy, physiology
and biochemistry to form the basic medical sciences and clinical
psychology to be taught and examined in the final MB.
Add your
comments
What
do you think? Email your comments on the above
article to the editor using the form below. Selected comments will
be displayed.
© 2001-7 Psychminded Limited. All
rights reserved
Email
a colleague
about this article
|
|