|
Pharmaceutical
firm broke advertising rules over antidepressant
May
3, 2003 - Source:
http://society.guardian.co.uk
A
drug company has been found to have broken the pharmaceutical industry's
code of practice five times by claiming that its antidepressant
is better than its out-of-patent drug from which the new product
is derived.
Lundbeck,
based in Denmark, put escitalopram (brand name Cipralex) on the
UK market last June. Escitalopram is made by splitting the active
molecule in Lundbeck's best-seller citalopram (Cipramil).
Such
practice is increasingly common in the fiercely competitive industry.
It enables a company whose drug is about to go off-patent and will
be copied and sold cheaply by generics companies, to secure a 20-year
monopoly on what is marketed as a new drug, but is merely the active
component of the old one.
Lundbeck
promoted the new drug as more effective. The Prescription Medicines
Code of Practice Authority, a self-regulatory body, has ruled that
the claim breaches the industry's code. Lundbeck must now change
its advertising in medical journals.
Eight
complaints were brought against the company by David Pyle, a psychiatrist
in Wales. He
objects to NHS doctors being urged to prescribe an expensive new
antidepressant when cheap generics of the old one are available.
The authority upheld five of Dr Pyle's complaints.
Lundbeck
was found in breach for claiming that "Cipralex is significantly
more effective than Cipramil in treating depression". Lundbeck
appealed, but lost.
Its
claim was based on three studies comparing the two drugs. Lundbeck
argued that although each study does not show statistical improvement,
when the three are pooled together there is evidence that the new
drug works faster. This meta-analysis was carried out by Jack Gorman
of Columbia University, New York, who declared $5,000 (£3,500)
of consulting fees from Lundbeck in the American Journal of Psychiatry
in January last year.
Add your
comments
What
do you think? Email your comments on the above
article to the editor using the form below. Selected comments will
be displayed.
© 2001-7 Psychminded Limited. All
rights reserved
Email
a colleague
about this article
|
|